Vox Populi
Standing up for the many in a world that revolves around the privileged few.
Pages
Followers
Mission
Questions? Comments?
Blog Archive
War, What is it Good For? - by Paul Watson
We are currently involved in a supposed “War on Terror”. We are all aware of the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. The reasons, or more appropriately, excuses for these actions are tied to the attacks of September 11th, 2001, but this answer is inadequate on levels too numerous to list here. I will, however, try to address the most outstanding. Firstly, the government of neither country was involved in the attacks. Those people responsible for 9/11 are a terrorist group. They must be punished. The people of Iraq and Afghanistan must not. We can hunt down these people and arrest or kill them, but it must be done with the cooperation of the governments in whose countries we are operating, and if it cannot be done with their cooperation, it should not be done at all. To attack a country and assume control of it is a violation of international law, the laws of just war, and the United States Constitution. It is, in fact, the behavior of an empire.
We are often told that we are providing a good service to the citizens in these places by removing bad governments from them. We removed the totalitarian Taliban and the sadistic Saddam. These things may be objectively good, but they are not the business of the United States, or of any other country for that matter. There is an essential concept in foreign relations known as self-determination. It is the idea that each country is responsible for itself. To understand the importance of this, imagine that there is president that you dislike in the White House. No matter how much you dislike him or disagree with him, would you approve of another country coming in and ousting him for us? Our involvement in these countries violates the policy of self-determination. Even if this were our purpose, why are we not doing the same in other countries, such as North Korea and Sudan, where the situation is much worse? This is obviously an excuse for our more secret objectives. Furthermore, even if this was our policy, is it even practical? We don’t have near the economic or military strength to do this for every country that “needs” it. Also, once we accept this idea that we can invade and take over a country for such a reason, does this not set a precedent for the invasion of any country we dislike in the future? Might we use this excuse perhaps to occupy regions which produce large amounts of valuable oil? Hmm, one does wonder…
We are often told that we are preserving freedom in the Middle East. Why are we then enforcing a police state? Why did the Iraqi government, which we installed, arrest over 300 people involved with the Jasmine Revolution for simply demonstrating against the government?
There were no nukes. Even if there were, it’s not our business who has nukes and who doesn’t. What if China decided they didn’t like us having nukes? Should they be able to come in here and make us give them up?
The army is for national defense. National defense entails only one thing: defending the nation. I cannot make this clear enough. We are currently using our army as a massive police force and an invasion force. We are involved militarily right now in Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen, and the public doesn’t even know about it. There are serious rumblings that we may soon be involved in the revolution in Libya. We have over 700 military bases in over 130 countries worldwide. We still occupy our post-WWII posts in Germany and Japan. Why? Might this be sending a message to the world that we mistrust them? Might this possibly hurt international relations? How would we as Americans feel if other countries had their military bases here? Do we even need these bases? Do they contribute to our ability to defend U.S. soil? Some would argue that we have prevented an invasion by attacking these countries first. Well then, if I ever feel like punching somebody, is it okay for me to do it as long as I say “I thought he was going to punch me?” No! How is this excuse not going to be abused? As I said earlier, this also is a precedent allowing us to go to wars for other reasons than those spoon-fed to us by the White House and the media.
Can we even afford this military action? The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have cost a combined nearly $1.2 trillion dollars. If those dollars were seconds, it would take over 38,000 years for that time to pass. Over 5,000 American troops have died and over 30,000 have been seriously injured in these wars. Also, a large part of our current interventionist foreign policy (so called because we intervene in other countries’ affairs trying to accomplish our own benefit, often at the expense of theirs) is the practice of foreign aid, wherein we fund countries’ government and give them weapons. Did you know that we installed the dictators of all these governments that are being revolted against right now? Did you know that we installed Saddam Hussein in control of Iraq and that we gave him money and weapons to fight Iran which he later used to persecute his own people? Did you know that we set up Osama bin Laden and equipped him with the resources necessary to drain the Soviets of power? In fact, bin Laden is now doing to us what he did to the USSR. He said it himself. One of the biggest factors in the USSR’s collapse was their failed invasion of Afghanistan. The USSR failed because it went bankrupt. Simply put, they went bankrupt in large part because of the money they wasted fighting Osama bin Laden. The reason he launched the attacks on 9/11 was to draw us into a similar money-draining war in hopes of bringing about financial collapse. This means that by occupying Afghanistan, we are losing. How can we hope to escape a similar fate to that of the Soviets? As the war goes on and the possibility of new wars arise, we creep ever closer to bankruptcy. Most Americans do not realize just how precarious our financial situation is. The collapse of the dollar is coming if “these shadows remain unchanged”, and with it comes the collapse of the United States. This could even open the door for us to enter into a new political and economic union with our northern and southern neighbors, but that is another matter entirely.
The American policy for decades has been to meddle in other countries’ affairs and install totalitarian governments and leaders in those countries to ensure our national interests are served. This is why people in the Middle East (and much of the rest of the world for that matter) hate us. We are often told they hate us because we are wealthy (what?), free (what?), “Christian” (what?), or any other half-baked lie. They hate us because we put dictators over them that torture them and kill their families! This is where terrorism has come from! This is the CIA principle of “blowback”, the idea that people react to you messing with their stuff. How can we do things like what we’ve done and expect people to just get over it? The notion is insane.
Bottom line: Our foreign policy and specifically the “War on Terror” are unethical, infeasible, and illegal.
As Churchill said, “the length of this document well defends against its being read.” I hope you have made the sacrifice of your precious time to do so despite the intimidation. Please give a little more of your time to engage in patriotic conversation with your American comrades. I have supplied some helpful links for those who are interested in learning more.
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/
http://costofwar.com/en/
Welcome To Vox Populi
We cannot allow ignorance to be bliss anymore, because we're blissfully sitting around on a quickly sinking ship.
We Support...
http://arcompassion.org/
Peter G. Peterson Foundation
http://www.pgpf.org/
Marijuana Policy Project
http://www.mpp.org/
Congressman Anthony Weiner
http://www.weiner.house.gov/
Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur
http://www.kaptur.house.gov/
Media Matters
http://mediamatters.org/
Bill Maher
http://www.billmaher.com
Earth Justice
http://earthjustice.org/
Categories
About the Authors
JJ Thompson is a 20 year old Economics/Broadcast Journalism student at Arkansas State University in Jonesboro, Arkansas. Before the age of 21, JJ had achieved no small amount of notoriety in the collegiate debate world, winning three national championships in the International Public Debate Association, as well as one national title in the National Parliamentary Debate Association. His interest in Government policy took hold early on, and JJ has been active on campaign trails since before he could vote. His commitment to public service and spreading political conscious has played strong roles in his decision to continue debating, coach high school debate programs, and attend Arkansas Boys State as a counselor every year.
Paul Watson - Civil Liberties/Economics Correspondent
Paul Watson is a 19 year old accounting major at Northeastern State University, and currently resides in Broken Arrow, OK. Paul's academic success has been outstanding by any measure, as he was awarded the prestigious and selective Outstanding Academic Achievement award by the State of Oklahoma as well as the President's Education Award while still in High School. He graduated High School from Mingo Valley Christian School Summa Cum Laude in 2010, and plans to pursue a career in the field of finance.
Stephanie Bullard - Legal/Race & Gender Issues correspondent
Attorney Stephanie Bullard has worked for Colorado Legal Services, the Colorado State Public Defender and the Federal Public Defender in the Western District of Missouri, for Harris Law in Springfield, MO, and now represents the Western district of Missouri as a public defender out of Joplin. Stephanie was an honors graduate of Missouri Southern State University, where she attended to study Speech Communication. Stephanie received many honors during her tenure at MSSU, including a Missouri Bright Flight Scholarship, the Glenn D. Dolence Leadership Award and the award for Outstanding Graduate in Speech Communication. Stephanie was also a member of the university’s National Championship debate team. Stephanie graduated Summa Cum Laude with her BA in 2003. Stephanie went on to pursue a graduate degree in Communication at the University of Arkansas's Fulbright College. While attending the University of Arkansas, Stephanie was a coach for the Arkansas Union Society’s National Championship Debate Team. Stephanie graduated Magna Cum Laude with her MA in 2005. Stephanie attended law school at the University of Denver’s Sturm College of Law in Colorado. She served as Moot Court Board President, Student Trial Lawyers Association coach and member of the Criminal Law Association. Stephanie graduated with her JD in 2008.